8 Crossbows Banned in Places Where Guns Are Still Legal

Daniel Whitaker

|

September 14, 2026

Crossbows occupy an unusual place in weapons law. They are not firearms because they launch projectiles through stored mechanical energy rather than an explosive charge, yet wildlife agencies often regulate them separately from both guns and traditional bows. That creates some surprising situations where a rifle may be legal during a particular hunt while a crossbow is prohibited or heavily restricted. The important distinction is that these are usually hunting or equipment restrictions, not blanket bans on owning every type of crossbow.

1. Oregon: Crossbows Stay Out of Hunting

Jordan Bergendahl /Pexels

Oregon is the clearest example of a place where the word “banned” needs context. Crossbows are not treated like ordinary archery equipment for hunting; state rules specify particular weapons for different species and seasons, while firearms remain legal under numerous authorized conditions. That creates an unusual split: a hunter may legally carry a rifle for an authorized season but cannot switch to a crossbow and assume the same privilege applies. The key number is 1 state: Oregon has stood apart from most of the country on crossbow hunting. Because wildlife rules can change, hunters should check the current Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife regulations before planning a trip.

2. Alaska: Bow-Only Areas Can Exclude Crossbows

Bailey Cloud/Pexels

Alaska shows how a crossbow can be legal in one hunting area and prohibited in another. Crossbows may be used where regulations allow both guns and bows, but they are not automatically accepted in areas restricted to bow-and-arrow equipment. That distinction matters because the weapon itself is not necessarily banned statewide. Instead, the location and season control the answer. One state can therefore produce two completely different results on the same day. Alaska’s rules also recognize special provisions for some disabled hunters. The important number here is 1 state with area-based restrictions that can place crossbows outside bow-only hunts.

3. Texas: Four Counties Have Extra Restrictions

Crossbowproductions, CC BY-SA 4.0/Wikimedia Commons

Texas is another example of a crossbow rule that can look like a ban until the fine print is read. State regulations generally recognize crossbows as lawful archery equipment, but 4 counties, Collin, Dallas, Grayson, and Rockwall, impose an additional restriction during the archery-only deer season. In those counties, a person generally needs an upper-limb disability and qualifying medical documentation to use a crossbow during that period. Firearms remain legal under seasons and conditions where the applicable rules permit them. The numerical detail is important: 4 counties carry this special restriction, showing how local hunting rules can be tighter than the broader state framework.

4. Colorado: Archery Season Is Not Automatically Crossbow Season

Wilfried Wittkowsky, CC BY-SA 3.0 /Wikimedia Commons

Colorado illustrates another important distinction between owning a crossbow and using it during a particular hunting season. Crossbows are generally accepted during firearms seasons, while archery-only opportunities can impose tighter limits, including provisions for hunters with disabilities. A person who can legally possess both a rifle and a crossbow cannot assume the two weapons receive identical treatment in every season. The restriction concerns the method of take, not a blanket prohibition. One number stands out: Colorado uses separate season structures, so hunters must match the crossbow to the specific license and season rather than relying on general weapon ownership rules.

5. Washington: Crossbows Face Tighter Hunting Rules

Capri23auto on Pixabay, CC0/ Wikimedia Commons

Washington has long treated crossbows more cautiously than many states, particularly when an individual wants to use one during an archery-only hunt. Crossbow access can depend on the season, species, and whether the hunter qualifies for a disability accommodation. A lawful firearm does not automatically make a crossbow lawful under every hunting rule. This is why calling such restrictions a statewide “crossbow ban” can be misleading. The important number is 1 state, Washington, where the distinction between ordinary archery equipment and a crossbow can materially affect eligibility. Always read the current wildlife regulations for the exact hunt before carrying one afield.

6. California: Crossbows Can Be Restricted by Season

Lance Cpl. Jason Jimenez, Public domain/Wikimedia Commons

California is another state where crossbow use can be more limited than firearm use. Crossbows are generally permitted during firearms seasons, while special rules apply in archery seasons. People with qualifying physical disabilities may receive an accommodation allowing crossbow use under circumstances where other hunters cannot use it. The basic split is simple: possession is one question, hunting authorization another. The useful number is 1 state with a season-based system that can make crossbow hunting substantially narrower than firearm hunting. California’s regulations can also change, so the current Department of Fish and Wildlife rules should be checked before every season.

7. Canada: Compact and One-Handed Crossbows Are Prohibited

Lance Cpl. Jason Jimenez, Public domain/Wikimedia Commons

Canada provides one of the strongest examples of a crossbow restriction that exists even though ordinary firearms are separately regulated and legally available. Federal rules prohibit crossbows that can be aimed and fired with one hand, as well as crossbows with an overall length of 500 millimetres or less. Longer, two-handed crossbows are treated differently and generally do not require a firearms licence or registration under the federal rules. The numerical thresholds are unusually clear: 1 hand for the prohibited firing style and 500 mm for the size limit. This is not a blanket ban on every crossbow; it targets compact and highly concealable designs.

8. Montana: Archery-Only Rules Can Separate Bows From Crossbows

Lance Cpl. Jason Jimenez, Public domain/Wikimedia Commons

Montana demonstrates why hunting-season language matters more than a simple legal-or-illegal label. Crossbow eligibility can differ between general weapon seasons and hunts restricted specifically to archery equipment. A firearm may be lawful during a general firearms season while a crossbow remains outside the approved equipment list for an archery-only opportunity. The distinction follows the hunt rules, not whether the owner can possess the device. The key number is 1 state, Montana, where hunters must examine the exact season and weapon definition before assuming a crossbow is permitted. The safest approach is to verify the current regulations for the hunt, species, and hunting district.

Leave a Comment