Outdoor Gear Splurges That Rarely Pay Off on the Trail

Daniel Whitaker

|

September 22, 2025

Americans spent over $23 billion on outdoor gear in 2022, according to the Outdoor Industry Association, yet surveys by Backpacker Magazine and REI Co-op highlight that a significant portion of this equipment remains underused. Many hikers report carrying items that add cost and weight without providing real-world benefits. Below are examples of expensive gear that rarely justifies the splurge once you’re out on the trail.

Hydration Bladders: More Hassle Than Help

Photo Credits : User_Pascal / Unsplash

Hydration bladders may look efficient, but a 2021 Appalachian Trail Conservancy survey found that more than 40% of long-distance hikers switched back to bottles mid-hike due to cleaning difficulties and leakage issues. Mold growth inside tubes is common if not dried properly, and repairs in the field are difficult compared to simply swapping a lightweight plastic bottle.

Overpriced Backpacks With Gimmicky Covers

Photo Credits : Chewool Kim / Unsplash

Backpacks with built-in waterproof covers often don’t live up to expectations. Independent gear tests from OutdoorGearLab showed that water-resistant backpack fabrics coupled with a $10 pack liner provided better protection than most attached covers, which tend to tear or blow off in heavy wind. Many hikers end up carrying extra liners anyway, making the premium backpack purchase unnecessary.

Multi-Tools: Heavy Metal Dead Weight

Photo Credits : Tory Hoffman / Unsplash

The average full-size multi-tool weighs 6–8 ounces, nearly half a pound. Yet research from a 2019 Thru-Hiker Gear Survey found that fewer than 15% of respondents used their multi-tools more than once a week on long hikes. For most trail repairs, a small knife and mini screwdriver are sufficient. Carrying a full toolkit often adds weight without meaningful utility.

Pocket-Packed Pants That Underperform

Photo Credits : apertur2.8 / pexels

Specialized hiking pants with multiple zippered pockets can cost upwards of $120, but durability tests by Consumer Reports found that budget synthetic blends under $50 performed just as well in abrasion resistance and breathability. Extra pockets are rarely filled on the trail, and overloaded pants shift weight awkwardly, reducing mobility. Many thru-hikers prefer lightweight running shorts or standard outdoor trousers.

Trekking Poles: Price Doesn’t Equal Performance

Photo Credits : Field Forest and Fire / Unsplash

High-end trekking poles can retail for $200 or more, yet comparative studies by Backpacker Gear Guide found no significant difference in stability or energy savings between premium carbon poles and mid-range aluminum ones priced under $60. Expensive poles are often less durable, snapping under high stress. Many seasoned hikers recommend investing in affordability and reliability rather than brand prestige.

Leave a Comment